![]() ![]() The only way to properly simulate thus high impedance source is with something like a reamping box.īut again, a line output *will work*, it may just not yield the same sound / tone you would expect. But the circuitry will not be operating under the same conditions it would if the source were a high impedance. And depending on the topology of the circuitry, this could potentially have ramifications in terms of frequency response. the design of the circuitry in the amplifier assumes the source impedance is going to be on the order of several K Ohms (a guitar). Guitar amps are therefore usually set up with a very, very high input impedance, usually on the order of 1M ohm.Ī line output has absolutely no problem driving this 1M ohm input. Guitars, with their very high source impedance, have great difficulty driving line inputs to the proper voltage (that's why guitars "seem" to be low level when connected to a line input). In line level interconnects you usually have a source impedance < 200 Ohms, and an input impedance in the 10-20k ohm range. Without going into all the nitty gritty details of Ohms law, signal transmission is "easiest" when the input impedance is about 10x higher than the source impedance. But that voltage must be developed across the the input impedance of the destination by the source impedance of the source. ![]() Signal is always transmitted between devices as a *voltage*. However, a guitar has s significantly higher source impedance (on the order of several hundred K ohms), whereas a typical line output has a source impedance well under 100 ohms. 5-1V (Which is not far below the fairly standard +4dBu reference level). (And you probably already have one lying around so.) Get too fast and loose with the connections and now the simulator plugins are winning again.While technically you can "make it work" with a low level line out, there are some complexities at play.Ī typical guitar outputs a signal level around. But you will very likely have better results using a passive DI box backwards. DI boxes are crucial to have whether you are recording straight through or reamping, whereas reamp boxes are only needed specifically for the reamping technique. You could likely get away with connecting a combo balanced/unbalanced 1/4" output directly to an amp input. Although reamp boxes can also theoretically work for keyboards and basses, reamp boxes are predominantly used for electric guitars. You don't need to have both of your stereo monitors connected during the reamp pass. You can "borrow" one of the outputs you normally use for monitoring for the reamp work. Since I use all of the above, I tend to like the Little Labs Red Eye 3D Phantom. Then, for reamping, either a passive reamp box or an active reamp box should be OK. (Note, this is the DI you use to capture your guitar DI). ![]() ![]() So my question is which Audio interface would allow me to do it this way and what cables will i need for this process ? Generally, you want an active DI if you use passive pickups and a passive DI if you use active pickups. That is exactly what i need! There is no Di boxes were involved so simple! Now i am using Focusrite Solo audio interface and it does not have the output lines. Hello guys! I saw a guy on Youtube showing how he takes his tracks out of DAW via the output on his Audio interface ( I could not see with audio interface he was using ) then send it to a guitar pedal Color Box processes it and then plug the output of the pedal back to the front input of his Audio interface. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |